Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Ambati

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11-37 (a) (4) (A) where the party had requested those fees “in his motion for [a] protective order”
• agreement stated that it was “made expressly subject to . . . the statutes and regulations of this institution and to the bylaws and policies of the [Board]”
• “[Q]ualified jurors under oath are presumed to follow the trial court’s instructions.”
• the grant or denial of a motion for protective order generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this Court will not interfere with the trial court’s exercise of its discretion absent clear abuse
• the grant or denial of a motion for protective order generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this Court will not interfere with the trial court’s exercise of its discretion absent clear abuse
• the “burden is on the plaintiff to show both the breach and the damage, and this must be done by evidence which will furnish the jury data sufficient to enable them to estimate with reasonable certainty the amount of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).