Skip to main content
· 10/3/2008

Board of Professional Responsibility v. Curry

Citations

  • 266 S.W.3d 379
  • 2008 Tenn. LEXIS 746
  • 2008 WL 4488949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[o]nce rebuttal evidence is presented, the question of receipt becomes an issue of fact for the court to decide.”
  • reversing panel's sanction of six-month suspension and affirming trial court's public censure when attorney did not convert or misappropriate client funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Barker, Holder, Clark, Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.