Skip to main content
· 5/28/1969

Board of Junior College District 504 v. Carey

Citations

  • 43 Ill. 2d 82
  • 250 N.E.2d 644
  • 1969 Ill. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] substantial need does not, as a matter of law, provide a legal basis for piercing the attorney-client privilege.”
  • rejecting compelling need argument in bad faith insurance action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.