Skip to main content
· 2/28/1990

Board of Education v. Plymouth Rubber Co.

Citations

  • 569 A.2d 1288
  • 82 Md. App. 9
  • 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 43
  • 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under Maryland law, negligent breach of a contract, absent a duty or obligation imposed by a source independent of that arising out of the contract itself, is not enough to sustain an action sounding in tort”
  • construction of contract is ordinarily considered to be an issue of law for resolution by trial judge but where there is legitimate doubt as to application under the circumstances, a question of fact is presented
  • “Under Maryland law, negligent breach of contract, absent a duty or obligation imposed by a source independent of that arising out of the contract itself, is not enough to sustain an action sounding in tort”
  • “Under Maryland law, negligent breach of contract, absent a duty or obligation imposed by a source independent of that arising out of the contract itself, is not enough to sustain an action sounding in tort”
  • finding summary judgment improper because warranty provision was ambiguous
  • applying section 5-101 to fraud and civil conspiracy claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Bishop, Alpert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.