Board of Education v. Beka Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recoupment need not be specifically pled under Md. Rule 2-323(d) and therefore it was timely raised and preserved for appellate review by the County Board’s initial answer
• concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
• concluding that mandamus did not lie to compel the Chief Judge of the District Court to appoint constables where money had not already been appropriated for the purpose
• relying on Stem, 380 Md. at 700-01, 846 A.2d at 1001-02, which in turn relied on Ruff, 278 Md. at 590, 366 A.2d at 366

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).