Skip to main content
· 1/16/2002

Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United States

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 1359
  • 51 Fed. Cl. 1359
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20436
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 679
  • 2002 WL 54492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that a proposed “use” show a “reasonable probability that, at the time of the taking, the land was both physically adaptable for such use and that there was a need or demand for such use in the reasonably near future”
  • requiring that a proposed “use” show a “reasonable probability that, at the time of the taking, the land was both physically adaptable for such use and that there was a need or demand for such use in the reasonably near' future”
  • noting that the larger parcel analysis in some jurisdictions requires all the composite properties to be “owned by the same party” but declining to decide whether to “adopt such a rule” because the parties did not ask it to
  • “[A] proposed ‘use’ requires a showing of reasonable probability that, at the time of the taking, the land was both physically adaptable for such use and that there was a need or demand for such use in the reasonably near future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Rader, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.