Board of County Commissioners v. Sundheim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that policy considerations weigh heavily against judicial creation of a state Bivens action, but noting that it “may be appropriate to recognize an implied state constitutional cause of action when there is no other adequate remedy”
• agreeing that policy considerations weigh heavily against judicial creation of a state Bivens action, but noting that it “may be appropriate to recognize an implied state constitutional cause of action when there is no other adequate remedy”
• agreeing that policy considerations weigh heavily against judicial creation of a state Bivens action, but noting that it “may be appropriate to recognize an implied state constitutional cause of action when there is no other adequate remedy”
• agreeing that policy considerations weigh heavily against judicial creation of a state Bivens action, but noting that it “may be appropriate to recognize an implied state constitutional cause of action when there is no other adequate remedy”
• excluding time bar in C.R.C.P. 106(b), as any interest in government efficiency and finality “must give way to th e compelling federal interest of giving § 1983 actions a broad bert h”
• same, where judicial review of administrative decision and relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).