Board of County Commissioners v. Collard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the manifestation of the parties’ agreement to marry need not take a particular form ”
• deciding that a collateral attack on a water decree was barred by the statut e of limitations where the limitations issue was raised below but was not decided by the trial court
• resume notice adequate where application revealed that substantial flows would be appropriated but did not clearly specify the type of right sought
• published resume seeking to appropriate substantial flows of identified streams “would raise a red flag (inquiry notice) to any person interested in water in the subject streams that significant water rights were being proposed in the areas described”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).