Skip to main content
· 11/23/1903

Board of Com'rs v. Irvine

Citations

  • 126 F. 689
  • 61 C.C.A. 607
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4354

Syllabus

<p>1 Subrogation — Holders of Void Municipal Bonds.</p> <p>Bona fide purchasers, in open market, for full value, of county bonds issued in payment of outstanding warrants, which were surrendered to the county and canceled, where such bonds have been adjudged void for want of power in the county to issue the same, are entitled to be subrogated in equity to the rights of the original warrant holders.</p> <p>2. Jurisdiction of Federal Courts — Suit by Assignee — County Warrants.</p> <p>County warrants payable to bearer are choses in action made by a corporation, and under section 1 of the judiciary act of March 3, 1887, c. 373, 24 Stat. 552, as amended by Act Aug. 13, 1888, c. 866, 25 Stat. 433 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 509], a holder thereof who is a citizen of another state may maintain an action against the county to recover thereon in a federal court, regardless of the citizenship of the original holders.</p> <p>8. Equity Jurisdiction — Suit to Enforce Canceled Warrants.</p> <p>Equity has jurisdiction of a suit by a holder of void county bonds, issued in payment of warrants which were surrendered and canceled and destroyed by the county, to rescind the agreement by which such cancellation was effected, and to enforce payment of the warrants by the county.</p> <p>4. Limitation — Void County Bonds — Action on Original Consideration.</p> <p>Limitation does not begin to run against a suit by a holder of void county bonds, issued in exchange for outstanding warrants, to rescind the transaction and enforce the warrants, until the bonds are repudiated by the county.</p> <p>5. Evidence — Public Records.</p> <p>A decree will not be reversed because the trial judge excluded from consideration a public record on the ground that it was entirely untrustworthy, where it showed erasures and alterations affecting the matters in issue which were unexplained; nor for the exclusion of another book, also offered as a public record, but which was not identified as such by a public cust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff has produced evidence that the fax advertisements were successfully sent, and the B2B evidence is sufficient for standing purposes. The TCPA does not specifically require proof of receipt”
  • damages provisions of TCPA designed to compensate and deter overall public harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.