Skip to main content
· 11/18/1907

Board of Com'rs v. Glassel

Citations

  • 120 La. 400
  • 45 So. 370

Syllabus

<p>1. Navigable Watbbs — Title to Bed — Sale by State. ,</p> <p>The right of the state to sell the bed of á stream which has ceased to be navigable cannot be disputed. The title to the bed of a navigable stream is in the state, subject to the-paramount right of navigation in the public.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For eases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 37, Navigable Waters, §§ 180-200.]</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Held, on the facts of the case, that the evidence failed to show that the stream surveyed and sold as a portion of a section of land was navigable at the date of the conveyance, and, further, that, even were it otherwise, the title of the state was good, and the purchaser cannot complain until disturbed by some exercise of the right of navigation in the public.</p> <p>3. Vendor and Purchaser — Objections by Vendee — Location oe Tract.</p> <p>A purchaser given 30 days to make a survey before accepting title cannot complain of error as to the location or character of the tract of land conveyed by sectional subdivisions.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that witness convenience favored transfer to the Northern District of Texas where witnesses were “likely within the subpoena power of the Northern District of Texas, but not the District of South Carolina”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Decree, Land, Nicholls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.