Skip to main content
· 1/30/1886

Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. Cottingham

Citations

  • 115 Ind. 64
  • 4 N.E. 589
  • 1886 Ind. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While to constitute the offense of embezzlement it is necessary that there be a criminal intent, yet where the money of the principal is knowingly used by the agent in violation of his duty, it is nonetheless embezzlement because at the time he intended to restore it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zollars

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.