Skip to main content
· 1/9/1896

Board of Commissioners v. Beals

Citations

  • 2 Kan. App. 313
  • 43 P. 95
  • 1895 Kan. App. LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the 20 continuing violations doctrine to a plaintiff’s Section 1983 claims
  • “[E]ven if a 15 continuing violation is demonstrated, the claim is still time-barred if none of the acts fall 16 within the limitations period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.