Board Drainage Commissioners v. Alliston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying defendants’ motion to dismiss premised on the same argument that BIPA excludes biometric identifiers derived from photographs
• finding jurisdiction where the defendants offered photo printing services and shipped hard copy photographs and other products to Illinois customers
• addressing defendants’ “personal jurisdiction argument first, because, if there is no in personam jurisdiction the Court will be unable to reach pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).2 (ECF Nos. 190-38, 190-39.
• “[I]f there is no in personam jurisdiction the Court will be unable to reach the Rule 12(b)(6) matter.”
• denying motion to dismiss face template claim
• declining to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).