BNSF Railway Co. v. United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that agency was not required to have “statistics on the rates of’ cheating on drug tests because “[a]s any successful use of cheating devices would not show up in statistics, the Department reasoned, it was ‘illogical’ to require statistical evidence of cheating”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).