Skip to main content
· 5/3/2006

B.M.B. v. State

Citations

  • 927 So. 2d 219
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[c]ourts should not readily infer that Congress has deprived the states of the power to act on interests deeply rooted in local feeling and responsibility which only peripherally concern an area controlled by noncon flicting federal legislation” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \[c]ourts should not readily infer that Congress has deprived states of the power to act on interests deeply rooted in local feeling and responsibility which only peripherally concern an area controlled by nonconflicting federal legislation\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[c]ourts should not readily infer that Congress has deprived states of the power to act on interests deeply rooted in local feeling and responsibility which only peripherally concern an area controlled by nonconflict-ing federal legislation” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd, Stringer, Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.