Blythe v. Hinckley
Citations
- 173 U.S. 501
- 19 S. Ct. 497
- 43 L. Ed. 783
- 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1456
Syllabus
<p>It appearing from the opinion of the Circuit Judge that the various bills in this case were dismissed on the grouiids: (1) That the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court could not be maintained because the state court, in the exercise of its general jurisdiction, determined the eligibility of the defendant Florence Blythe to inherit an estate which that court was called upon to distribute under the laws of the State, and that other propositions contended for by the complainants were for the same reason deemed insufficient to tafee this case out of the general rule that after a court of a State, with full jurisdiction over property in its possession, has finally determined all rights to that property, a court of the United States'will not entertain jurisdiction to annul such decree and disturb rights once definitely determined; and (2) That the remedy of complainants, if any, was at law, and -not in equity. Held, As neither ground went to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court as a court of the United States, the appeal could not be sustained as within any class mentioned in § 5 of the Judiciary Act of 1891; and, if error was committed this was dot the proper mode for correcting it.</p>
Judges: Fuller, After Stating the Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 294×
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court· 1923-04-09· cited 259×
- Giles v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1903-04-27· cited 129×
- Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1927-04-25· cited 98×
- Board of Trade v. Hammond Elevator Co.Supreme Court· 1905-05-29· cited 79×
- Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court· 1901-01-07· cited 73×
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. EckmanSupreme Court· 1903-01-05· cited 72×
- Louisville Trust Co. v. KnottSupreme Court· 1903-11-30· cited 52×
- Courtney v. PradtSupreme Court· 1905-01-03· cited 39×
- Scully v. BirdSupreme Court· 1908-05-04· cited 34×
- In Re Apportionment of State Legislature—1964Michigan Supreme Court· 1964-05-26· cited 29×
- In re ShoesmithSeventh Circuit· 1905-01-03· cited 23×
- Bache v. HuntSupreme Court· 1904-04-04· cited 19×
- United States v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1908-02-24· cited 19×
- Ehrlich v. WeberTennessee Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 19×
- Huntington v. LaidleySupreme Court· 1900-03-12· cited 18×
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. NewmanSeventh Circuit· 1911-04-18· cited 17×
- Davis v. Anderson-Tully Co.Eighth Circuit· 1918-09-02· cited 17×
- Jefferson v. Gypsy Oil Co.Eighth Circuit· 1928-06-08· cited 16×
- Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Third Circuit· 1910-11-17· cited 16×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Blythe v. Hinckley
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.