Bluthenthal v. Jones
Citations
- 208 U.S. 64
- 28 S. Ct. 192
- 52 L. Ed. 390
- 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1423
Syllabus
<p>Courts are not bound to search the records of other courts and give effect • to their judgments, and one who relies upon a former adjudication in another court must properly present it to the court in which he seeks to enforce it.</p> <p>While an adjudication in1 bankruptcy, refusing, a discharge, finally determines for, all time and in all courts, as between the parties and their privies, the facts upon which the refusal is based, it must be proved in a second proceeding brought by the bankrupt in another district, and of which the creditor has notice, in order to bar the bankrupt’s discharge therefrom, if the debt is provable under the statute as amended at the time of the second proceeding although it may not have been such under the statute at the time of the first proceeding.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing claims to “stand” in a subsequent bankruptcy ease effectively waived any assertion that the discharge in a case which could have been denied on the ground that the presence of an earlier case barred a discharge could be raised
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court· 1925-11-16· cited 192×
- United States v. City of MiamiFifth Circuit· 1981-12-03· cited 159×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1981-12-03· cited 66×
- Willoughby v. JamisonEighth Circuit· 1939-05-13· cited 33×
- Bacon v. Buffalo Cold Storage Co.Fifth Circuit· 1912-01-09· cited 31×
- Royal American Oil & Gas Co. v. Szafranski (In Re Szafranski)N.D. Oklahoma· 1992-12-10· cited 23×
- Chapman v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1954-07-08· cited 21×
- In re JacobsSixth Circuit· 1917-05-08· cited 21×
- Pollet v. CoselFirst Circuit· 1910-05-18· cited 19×
- Loughran v. Hazleton Mercantile Co.Third Circuit· 1914-12-24· cited 19×
- Hisey v. Lewis-Gale Hospital, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 1939-03-24· cited 16×
- In Re ZeilerS.D. New York· 1937-03-01· cited 15×
- In Re SeidenSecond Circuit· 1949-05-10· cited 12×
- In Re GoldbergSixth Circuit· 1931-11-06· cited 12×
- Harris v. WarshawskySecond Circuit· 1950-10-23· cited 11×
- Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Wright (In Re Wright)N.D. Alabama· 1980-11-13· cited 11×
- The General Protestant Orphans' Home v. Roger Scott IveySixth Circuit· 1956-12-28· cited 10×
- In Re SummerSecond Circuit· 1939-11-06· cited 10×
- Butler Bros. v. MasorSeventh Circuit· 1941-02-06· cited 10×
- Prudential Loan & Finance Co. v. RobartsFifth Circuit· 1931-10-26· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.