Blunt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in light of other evidence identifying the defendant as the perpetrator, there was no reasonable likelihood that the trial’s outcome would have been different if the challenged in-court identifications had been excluded
• in light of other evidence identifying the defendant as the perpetrator, there was no reasonable likelihood that the trial’s outcome would have been different if the challenged in-court identifications had been excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-14· cited 29×
• Bryson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-29· cited 23×
• Hammock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-12· cited 14×
• In the Interest of E. C.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-30· cited 8×
• Wilburn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-19· cited 3×
• In Re Ec
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-30
• Julius Bryson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Momon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-08· cited 197×
• Tenorio v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-11· cited 22×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-01-22· cited 13×
• Cook v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-02· cited 7×