Blundell v. Walls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively for an aggregate sentence of forty-one to eighty-two years of imprisonment
• holding that standard- range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively
• holding that standard-range sentences were not excessive even though they ran consecutively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).