Blumer v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy language is considered in the light in which it would normally be understood by the lay person who bought and paid for the policy
• holding that where “resolution of the case involves the interpretation of an insurance contract, we give no deference to the circuit court as contract interpretation is a question of law”
• finding an owned-vehicle exclusion invalid \to the extent of the limits required by the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law\
• “Interpretation of an insurance policy and the determination of whether provisions are ambiguous are questions of law, subject to de novo review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).