· 9/24/1987
Blumenthal v. Teets
Citations
- 745 P.2d 181
- 155 Ariz. 123
- 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the plaintiff did not have “reasonable cause for the filing of this complaint”
- affirming denial of leave to amend where the plaintiff “did not file any motion to amend the complaint”
- finding it was not error for a trial court to fail to allow the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint when the plaintiff made no motion for leave to amend
- trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees under A.R.S. § 10-049(B)
- When “the plaintiff did not file any motion to amend the complaint[,] [t]he failure of the trial court to allow plaintiff to amend the complaint was not error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shelley, Corcoran, Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.