Skip to main content
· 9/24/1987

Blumenthal v. Teets

Citations

  • 745 P.2d 181
  • 155 Ariz. 123
  • 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the plaintiff did not have “reasonable cause for the filing of this complaint”
  • affirming denial of leave to amend where the plaintiff “did not file any motion to amend the complaint”
  • finding it was not error for a trial court to fail to allow the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint when the plaintiff made no motion for leave to amend
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees under A.R.S. § 10-049(B)
  • When “the plaintiff did not file any motion to amend the complaint[,] [t]he failure of the trial court to allow plaintiff to amend the complaint was not error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shelley, Corcoran, Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.