Blumenthal v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving the Commission’s “reasonabl[e] reli[ance] on its continuing oversight of the market to guard against potential abuses of market power”
• finding no improper collateral attack where petition relied on “factual developments” that were “unanticipated” at the time of the original orders
• “FERC reasonably relied on its continuing oversight of the market”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).