Skip to main content
· 11/16/1903

Blumberg v. Pecarsky

Citations

  • 23 Pa. Super. 568
  • 1903 Pa. Super. LEXIS 116

Syllabus

<p>Judgment— Validity of judgment — Evidence—False representations.</p> <p>On the trial of an issue to determine the validity of a judgment, where the testimony shows that the parties had agreed to an exchange of lands, and had each placed in the hands of a conveyancer his judgment note to be entered up if he should back out of the bargain, and the only question before the jury is whether the defendant whose note had been entered up, shad backed out of the bargain, testimony as to alleged false representations which were the inducement for the agreement of exchange is irrelevant.</p>

Judges: Bea, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Pee, Porter, Rice, Smith, Ver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.