Blum v. Schrader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts must construe our Constitution to make its parts harmonize and to give sensible meaning to each of them
• basic rale of constitutional construction that no provision is presumed to be without meaning
• basic rule of constitutional construction that no provision is presumed to be without meaning
• “[I]t is a basic rule of constitutional construction that no provision is presumed to be without meaning and that all of its parts should be construed so as to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each of them.”
• “[I]t is a basic rule of constitutional construction that no provision is presumed to be without meaning and that all of its parts should be construed so as to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each of them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).