Blum v. Friedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the word “aggrieved” in Vermont’s open meeting law to incorporate the general standing doctrine, and noting that “[w]e have applied general standing doctrine to similar statutory standing requirements.”
• interpreting the word “aggrieved” in Vermont’s open meeting law to incorporate the general standing doctrine, and noting that “[w]e have applied general standing doctrine to similar statutory standing requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).