Blum v. Bacon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court of appeals may raise procedural default sua sponte
• so long as federal regulation requiring that EA be available to AFDC recipients is complied with, state may fix eligibility standards for EA in any way it chooses
• “[T]he interpretation of [the] agency charged with the administration of [this] statute is entitled to substantial deference.”
• the appellee could raise a statutory argument on appeal that had been rejected by the lower court despite not having filed a cross-appeal because his relief under the judgment granting an injunction would not be modified
• state may not exclude AFDC recipients from Emergency Assistance Program

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).