Bluffs Development Co. v. Board of Adjustment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring showing that the evidence “is so strong that reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion” to meet burden of proving prejudice as a matter of law
• stating board members’ relationships with opponents to the at-issue proposal were too attenuated to be deemed disqualifying interests
• facts are established as a matter of law if “reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion”
• claim that members of county zoning board of adjustment had prejudged application for conditional use not supported by questioning of individual members at hearing or by depositions during certiorari proceedings following the hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).