Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., and Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was necessary for the trial court to “make further determination as to what costs, if any, the plaintiffs would have incurred in the absence of breach and thus to ascertain the net financial effect of the breach on the plaintiffs”
• holding that it was necessary for the trial court to “make further determination as to what costs, if any, the plaintiffs would have incurred in the absence of breach and thus to ascertain the net financial effect of the breach on the plaintiffs”
• holding that it was necessary for the trial court to “make further determination as to what costs, if any, the plaintiffs would have incurred in the absence of breach and thus to ascertain the net financial effect of the breach on the plaintiffs”
• holding that it was necessary for the trial court to “make further determination as to what costs, if any, the plaintiffs would have incurred in the absence of breach and thus to ascertain the net financial effect of the breach on the plaintiffs”
• \Both sides ... continue to take an all-or-nothing approach on appeal.... We do not accept either of those extreme positions.\
• “[T]he non-breaching party should not be placed in a better position through the award of damages than if there had been no breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).