Skip to main content
· 9/22/1982

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,762, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,822 Martin-Marietta Corporation v. Bendix Corporation, United Technologies v. Bendix Corporation

Citations

  • 690 F.2d 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “subjecting [tender offers] to an unconstitutional application of [state laws regulating tender offers] amounts to irreparable injury.”
  • “subjecting [tender offerors] to an unconstitutional application of [state laws regulating tender offers] amounts to irreparable injury.”
  • Congressional policy is to permit the investor “to make his own independent but informed decision whether to sell.”
  • “It is in the public interest not to perpetuate the unconstitutional application of a statute.”
  • “[l]t is in the public interest not to perpetuate the unconstitutional application of a statute.”
  • “It is in the public interest not to perpetuate the unconstitutional application of a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Keith, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.