Blue Ridge Telephone Co. v. City of Blue Ridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where “city’s acquiescence did not carry any promise, explicit or implicit, that it would allow [existing arrangement] to continue for any definite time or for any time into the future whatsoever,” no basis existed for restraining city’s exercise of its power to change arrangement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).