Skip to main content
· 1/20/1989

Blue Ridge Bank v. Veribanc, Inc., Blue Ridge Bank v. Veribanc, Inc.

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 681
  • 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1122
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 494
  • 1989 WL 2858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the imposition of liability involves a determination of whether or not the speech involves a matter of public concern
  • plaintiff’s ads did not raise the bank’s corporate financial health which was the subject of defendant’s report
  • where Fourth Circuit applied the Fitzgerald/Gertz standard to a corporate plaintiff
  • “Because of the obvious importance of banks to the financial health of our communities, an historic governmental interest in the operations and solvency of these institutions, we have no difficulty concluding that [defendants’] statements relate to a matter of public controversy.”
  • although the Fourth Circuit found that the local bank exercised considerable influence over the economy of the county, the Circuit Court did not find that the plaintiff exercised pervasive influence over all public issues so as to elevate it to general purpose public figure status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Sprouse, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.