· 1/11/2005
Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. v. Hart
Citations
- 152 S.W.3d 420
- 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 693
- 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 25
- 2005 WL 41384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- held that a “Motion to Amend and Reconsider Judgment” need not cite any rule or statute to be an authorized after-trial motion, overruling opinions to the contrary, and that the motion qualified as a motion to amend because it alleged errors in the judgment language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis, Lowenstein, Breckenridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.