Skip to main content
· 1/11/2005

Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. v. Hart

Citations

  • 152 S.W.3d 420
  • 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 693
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 25
  • 2005 WL 41384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • held that a “Motion to Amend and Reconsider Judgment” need not cite any rule or statute to be an authorized after-trial motion, overruling opinions to the contrary, and that the motion qualified as a motion to amend because it alleged errors in the judgment language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis, Lowenstein, Breckenridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.