Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania v. Nardone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that the defendant reinvested racketeering proceeds into his business and thereby was able to continue his racketeering activity alleged sufficient injury from the “use and investment” of racketeering income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).