Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. v. Hendrix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conflicting affidavits created a genuine issue of material fact and that summary judgment should not have been entered
• holding that the trial court should not have attempted to resolve issue raised by conflicting affidavits as to amount due under the contractual agreement at issue through summary judgment
• “The conflicting affidavits were ‘on file’ at the time of the hearing, created a genuine issue of material fact and a summary judgment should not have been entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).