Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation v. Marshfield Clinic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prevailing party was not “entitled to fees and costs allocable to claims and theories that neither succeeded, nor contributed to the limited victory that it . . . obtained”
• excluding Dr. Beyer’s expert testimony under Daubert and referring to it as “inconsistent with common sense and the evidence generally”
• “Statistical studies that fail to correct for salient factors, not attributable to the defendant's misconduct, that may have caused the harm of which the plaintiff is complaining do not provide a rational basis for a judgment.”
• “Statistical studies that fail to correct for salient factors, not attributable to the defendant’s misconduct, that may have caused the harm of which the plaintiff is complaining do not provide a rational basis for a judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).