Blount v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the disclosure of phone numbers and dates of birth implicates privacy concerns and, in the Court's view, should not be required absent particularized need”
• concluding that “the disclosure of phone numbers and dates of birth implicates privacy concerns and, in the Court’s view, should not be required absent particularized need”
• holding differences in damages amounts did not suffice to defeat conditional certification
• holding differences in damages amounts did not suffice to defeat conditional certification
• granting conditional certification with respect to allegedly unlawful policy despite immaterial variations in how it was applied
• granting certification despite wide variations in “type, frequency, and impact of interruptions on the guards’ meal breaks” at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).