· 7/22/1993
Bloomquist v. Ely
Citations
- 617 N.E.2d 474
- 247 Ill. App. 3d 656
- 187 Ill. Dec. 266
- 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 1110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
- whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
- whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
- trial court did not err in allowing testimony where, although not disclosed under discovery rule, the expert’s opinions were disclosed in depositions and therefore there was no surprise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stouder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.