Skip to main content
· 7/22/1993

Bloomquist v. Ely

Citations

  • 617 N.E.2d 474
  • 247 Ill. App. 3d 656
  • 187 Ill. Dec. 266
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 1110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
  • whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
  • whether a certain device constitutes implement of husbandry as defined by statute raises mixed question of law and fact
  • trial court did not err in allowing testimony where, although not disclosed under discovery rule, the expert’s opinions were disclosed in depositions and therefore there was no surprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stouder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.