Skip to main content
· 2/5/2004

Bloomington-Normal Seating Co., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

Citations

  • 357 F.3d 692
  • 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2236
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting examples of extraordinary circumstances include “ ‘clear bias by the ALJ, utter disregard of uncontroverted sworn testimony, or acceptance of testimony that on its face is incredible’ ”
  • “It is not our place to engage in our own fact finding or supplant the Board’s reasonable conclusions even though we would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before us de novo.”
  • “It is not our place to engage in our own fact finding or supplant the Board’s reasonable conclusions even though we would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before us de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.