· 2/5/2004
Bloomington-Normal Seating Co., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
Citations
- 357 F.3d 692
- 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2236
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting examples of extraordinary circumstances include “ ‘clear bias by the ALJ, utter disregard of uncontroverted sworn testimony, or acceptance of testimony that on its face is incredible’ ”
- “It is not our place to engage in our own fact finding or supplant the Board’s reasonable conclusions even though we would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before us de novo.”
- “It is not our place to engage in our own fact finding or supplant the Board’s reasonable conclusions even though we would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before us de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Posner, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.