Bloomingdale v. Weil
Citations
- 29 Wash. 611
- 70 P. 94
- 1902 Wash. LEXIS 622
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL — DEFECTIVE BOND — AMENDMENT ON MOTION TO DISMISS.</p> <p>Under Laws 1899, p. 29, wbicb provides that on tbe bearing of a motion to dismiss an appeal tbe supreme court may allow all amendments in matters of form, and tbat no appeal shall be dismissed for any informality or defect in tbe appeal bond, etc., if the appellant shall forthwith, upon order of the court, perfect the appeal, an appeal will not be dismissed because the bond, while purporting on its face to be made by the appellants and a surety as a jo.nt and several obligation, was signed by the surety alone, but the appellants will be permitted to complete its execution by signing it at the time of the hearing of the motion for dismissal.</p> <p>FOREIGN ASSIGNMENTS — RIGHTS OF ASSIGNEE AS AGAINST FOREIGN CREDITORS.</p> <p>A foreign creditor of a foreign debtor cannot attach his debtor’s realty in this state, where the debtor has made a voluntary assignment of all his property for the benefit of creditors to a foreign assignee, who has complied with the laws of this state relating to the recording of such instruments, when such assignment was valid under the laws where executed and does not conflict with the laws or public policy of this state.</p> <p>SAME-QUIETING TITLE — EFFECT OF DEED OF ASSIGNMENT DEFECTIVELY CERTIFIED.</p> <p>A deed of assignment made in another state and properly acknowledged, but defectively certified by reason of the absence of the notary’s seal and of the certificate of a clerk of a court of record authenticating such notary and his signature, as required by Bal. Code, § 4528, is sufficient to pass the equitable title to realty in this state to the assignee, and enable him to maintain action to quiet title thereto, under Bal. Code, § 5508, as against foreign creditors, inasmuch as they do not occupy the relation of bona fide purchasers.</p>
Judges: White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pacific State Bank v. CoatsNinth Circuit· 1913-05-21· cited 35×
- Matson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1908-01-15· cited 24×
- Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-03-13· cited 22×
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-21· cited 16×
- Westland Publishing Co. v. RoyalWashington Supreme Court· 1904-12-29· cited 11×
- Malm v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court· 1919-12-15· cited 10×
- Douglas v. Badger State MineWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-28· cited 9×
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court· 1923-04-21· cited 8×
- White v. SandersWashington Supreme Court· 1917-12-05· cited 3×
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-09-19· cited 2×
- Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1929-04-05
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court· 1890-01-20· cited 339×
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court· 1867-04-22· cited 93×
- Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals· 1884-06-03· cited 75×
- Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court· 1900-11-07· cited 47×
- Barth v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals· 1893-11-28· cited 39×
- Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co.Supreme Court· 1899-04-11· cited 31×
- Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1890-04-29· cited 30×
- DeRoberts v. StilesWashington Supreme Court· 1901-04-16· cited 28×
- Paine v. LesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1876-12-15· cited 26×
- May v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-11-11· cited 17×
- King v. CrossSupreme Court· 1899-12-11· cited 16×
- Hacker v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1900-04-30· cited 13×
- Jenks v. LuddenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1886-02-17· cited 11×
- Train v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-06-28· cited 10×
- Frank v. BobbittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1891-12-14· cited 10×
- Pennsylvania Mortgage Investment Co. v. GilbertWashington Supreme Court· 1898-02-21· cited 7×
- Happy v. PrickettWashington Supreme Court· 1901-03-22· cited 6×
- Proctor v. National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1890-09-05· cited 6×
- Barnett v. KinneyIdaho Supreme Court· 1890-03-05· cited 3×
- Halsted v. StrausU.S. Circuit Court· 1887-10-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.