Skip to main content
· 1/2/2004

Bloomingdale v. State

Citations

  • 842 A.2d 1212
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 1
  • 2004 WL 510763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because reporting erratic driving “is such an intricate, improbable, and imprecise method of harassing another,” the risk of a tip being falsified by an informant is “significantly reduced”
  • concluding that because reporting erratic driving “is such an intricate, improbable, and imprecise method of harassing another, the risk that an anonymous tip of erratic driving has been submitted by a malicious, false informant becomes significantly reduced”
  • concluding'that, because reporting erratic driving “is such an intricate, improbable, and imprecise method of harassing another,” the risk of a tip being falsified by an informant' is “significantly reduced”
  • referring to the “less invasive nature of a traffic stop as compared with a public body frisk” that occurred in J.L.
  • referring to the \less invasive nature of a traffic stop as compared with a public body frisk\ that occurred in J.L.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Steele, Jacobs, Strine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.