Bloomfield v. Hargett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Federal courts sitting in diversity cases will, of course, apply the substantive law of the forum State on outcome determinative issues.”
• “Federal courts sitting in diversity cases will, of course, apply the substantive law of the forum State on outcome determinative issues.”
• “Federal courts sitting in diversity cases will, of course, apply the substantive law of the forum State on outcome determinative issues.”
• “Federal courts sitting in diversity cases will, of course, apply the substantive law of the forum State on outcome determinative issues.”
• “Federal courts sitting in diversity cases will, of course, apply the substantive law of the forum State on outcome determinative issues.”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinderʹs choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quoting Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).