Bloom v. Ravoira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a court may grant summary judgment in a comparative negligence case if “the sole reasonable inference which may be drawn from the evidence is that the plaintiff's negligence exceeded fifty percent”
• finding, as a matter of law, plaintiffs own negligence was greater than any potential negligence by defendant, thus precluding his recovery in a negligence action
• finding, as a matter of law, plaintiffs own negligence was greater than any potential negligence by defendant, thus precluding his recovery in a negligence action
• finding where a verdict is not reasonably possible under the facts presented, summary judgment is proper
• stating where a verdict is not reasonably possible under the facts presented, summary judgment is proper
• stating a plaintiff in a negligence action “may only recover damages if his own negligence is not greater than that of the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).