Bloom v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a manager’s refusal to change an employee’s job title to a “more distinguished or prestigious” title after a reassignment “plausibly suggests” an adverse action
• reviewing a challenge to an agency’s application of the Douglas factors in the imposition of a suspension
• “Because, however, the standards for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion and 1 On August 3, 2016, this Court granted Defendant Tilahun’s Motion to Dismiss the claims against him for promissory estoppel and quantum meruit. See Alemayehu v. Abere, 199 F. Supp. 3d 74 (D.D.C. 2016
• “Because . . . the standards for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion and a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings are identical, courts routinely construe motions to dismiss that are filed after a responsive pleading as motions for judgment on the pleadings . . . .”
• “Because . . . the standards for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion and a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings are identical, courts routinely construe motions to dismiss that are filed after a responsive pleading as motions for judgment on the pleadings . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).