Skip to main content
· 2/4/1988

Bloom v. Guth

Citations

  • 517 N.E.2d 1154
  • 164 Ill. App. 3d 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that all of the claims included in the plaintiff’s complaint, including claims for breach of contract and consumer fraud, sounded in medical malpractice, rendering section 2-622’s affidavit requirement applicable
  • concluding that all of the claims included in the plaintiff's complaint, including claims for breach of contract and consumer fraud, sounded in medical malpractice, rendering section 2-622's affidavit requirement applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.