Blomgren v. Ogle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while an apartment’s rule discriminated on its face, damages “may be imposed only where there is credible proof of harm proximately caused by the violation”
• holding that, while an apartment’s rule discriminated on its face, damages “may be imposed only where there is credible proof of harm proximately caused by the violation”
• granting partial summary judgment on 3604(c) claim, but noting damages must be proven at trial
• discriminatory written apartment rule violated 3604(c), even though plaintiff testified that she had never seen the rule and defendants testified the rule was never enforced
• flyer distributed that no children or pets allowed in the apartment as a matter of law discriminatory
• apartment complex rules discriminated based on familial status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).