Blomendale v. Imbrescia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because “[t]he buyer introduced new elements which had not been discussed, let alone agreed upon[,] ... the parties did not intend to be bound by the preliminary document”
• restrictions on delivery of deposit and warranties sought to be included in purchase and sale agreement reflected imperfect negotiations
• no enforceable contract to purchase property where check for buyer’s deposit could be cashed only upon execution of purchase and sale agreement, and where ‘“sketchy preliminary document.. . . [left] many points uncovered”
• no enforceable contract to purchase property where check for buyer's deposit could be cashed only upon execution of purchase and sale agreement, and where \sketchy preliminary document . . . . [left] many points uncovered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).