Skip to main content
· 6/26/2002

Bloise v. Bloise

Citations

  • 437 Mass. 1010
  • 770 N.E.2d 472
  • 2002 Mass. LEXIS 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming adoption of English common-law offense of libel because speech “was sufficiently scur- rilous, abusive and indecent, and calculated to stir up and provoke contention and strife, and so far to disturb the peace”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.