Bloedorn v. Francisco Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the ALJ is the Board’s first-level decisionmaker” and that “the ALJ’s factual and legal determinations supply a useful benchmark against which the Director’s prospects of success may be weighed.”
• “Having presided over the merits hearing, the ALJ's factual and legal determinations supply a useful benchmark against which the [petitioner’s] prospects of success may be weighed.”
• reinstating job applicants that employer did not hire held possibility of displacing current employees
• without an injunction, the NLRB’s reinstatement of diseriminated-against former employees would be'unrealistic as the employees may be unavailable; the defendant’s employees were “working without the advocacy of their chosen representative”
• employer’s unlawful dis- criminatory motive is the “critical question” in a § 158(a)(3) proceeding
• employer’s unlawful dis- criminatory motive is the “critical question” in a § 158(a)(3) proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).