Blodgett v. Inglis
Citations
- 63 Wash. 513
- 115 P. 1043
- 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1236
Syllabus
<p>Assignment fob Creditors — Discharge—Partner of Debtor — Liability for Deficiency. Where creditors agree to accept an assignment in full payment of their claims, they cannot subsequently recover the deficiency from an associate of their debtor on the claim that there was a silent partnership between them; since the discharge of one partner discharges all.</p> <p>Same — Representations—Effect. An agreement by creditors to discharge their debtor in consideration of an assignment for creditors operates to discharge the debtor’s partner, notwithstanding representations made to the creditors that it would not have that effect, where the partner was not responsible for thé representations.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Our common law holds that chancery court jurisdiction exists to review 14 an administrative agency decision ‘where there is no statutory scheme for appeal from a decision of a state board or agency . . . .’” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.