Blockbuster Entertainment Group v. Laylco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trademark infringement where the defendant, a video rental store, attracted customers’ initial interest by using a sign confusingly to its competitor’s even though confusion would end long before the point of sale or rental
• emphasis placed on fact that defendant “has been in existence for only five years, and it has not produced evidence of an extensive advertising campaign to promote its name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).